Basket
×

Your basket

Join The FSA

FSF disgust at fan court verdict

This is a story from the FSF archive – the FSF and SD merged to become the FSA in 2019.

The Football Supporters’ Federation (FSF) offers its whole-hearted support to Chelsea fan Cliff Auger following today’s West London Courthouse decision to find him guilty of causing unnecessary suffering to a protected animal following Cliff’s actions to protect his own son.

The court fined Cliff £500 while the police left him with four broken ribs and a punctured lung following the incident in January. A public order charge relating to threatening words and behaviour was thrown out.

We believe this verdict sends out the ridiculous message that a father does not have the right to protect his own child. The FSF feel that this is a particularly malicious and vindictive prosecution.

Cliff is a lifelong Chelsea fan who attended the Chelsea v Queens Park Rangers FA Cup tie on Saturday, January 5, 2008, with his two sons aged 13 and 16.

Following the match one of his son’s friends went into a pub to use the toilet, shortly afterwards the premises were ‘locked down’ by the police meaning no one could enter or leave.

Whilst asking police if his son’s friend might be permitted to leave the pub, Cliff’s eldest son James was bitten on the leg by a police dog. In an attempt to release his son from the dog’s grip, Cliff kicked the dog and was immediately wrestled to the floor by police officers.

Cliff was taken to the police station where he was charged with causing unnecessary suffering to a protected animal.

After complaining that he had sustained numerous injuries, he was eventually taken to hospital where he was told he had four broken ribs and a punctured lung. Emergency surgery was required and Cliff remained in hospital for four days, and subsequently missed six weeks’ work.

Cliff is now pursuing a complaint with the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC).

FSF director of policy & campaigns, Steve Powell, said: “The FSF are dismayed that Cliff has been found guilty of a charge we believe should never even have been brought.

“Cliff moved to protect his son in the same way any parent would. Should acting on instinct to protect your child really result in a criminal record? We don’t believe so.

“He and his family and friends were nothing more than innocent bystanders – simply in the wrong place at the wrong time.  They are not football hooligans.

“While this case is extreme, we frequently hear from supporters complaining of heavy handed treatment from police. Our work with the police will continue, in a bid to ensure supporters are treated fairly and impartially.”

Related Articles

Court paves way for end of Oystons at Blackpool

Blackpool has been put into receivership by the High Court, paving the way for the sale of the club and the end of the Oystons’ ownership.

Fan groups urged to back indepdendent inquiry into abuse

The FSF National Council is asking supporters’ organisations to join them and get behind a petition calling for an independent inquiry into child sex abuse in football.

Ahead of the curve: fan engagement is in Doncaster’s nature

New rules, coming into force at the start of the 2016/17 season, mean clubs have to engage in structured dialogue with their supporters. As Martin O’Hara points out, FSF deputy chair and secretary of the Vikings Supporters Co-operative at Doncaster Rovers, some clubs are far better at this than others and Doncaster Rovers are way ahead of the curve…

Every demographic of Arsenal fan wants safe standing

Arsenal fans are overwhelmingly back the introduction of safe standing, according to one of the largest surveys on the subject published today.

Funding partners

  • The Football Association
  • Premier Leage Fans Fund

Partners

  • Gamble Aware
  • Co-operatives UK
  • FSE
  • Kick It Out
  • Level Playing Field
  • Living Wage Foundation
  • SD Europe