Posted on 3rd May 2013
Sussex Police say they have learned lessons and taken action against senior officers following complaints from Crystal Palace fans who travelled to Brighton in November 2017.
Posted on 3rd May 2013
This is a story from the FSF archive – the FSF and SD merged to become the FSA in 2019.
The decision by the Metropolitan Police, Sussex Police and the two clubs involved to impose restrictions above and beyond normal ticketing procedures, should they meet in the play-offs, appears to have been done without any consultation with fans’ groups.
That alone is enough to cause concern for the Football Supporters’ Federation, but it is far from the only issue. Forcing away fans to carry identification under threat of refusal of entry to a match is unnecessary and unwanted.
Would these restrictions be imposed on people going to any other type of event?
The FSF is firmly opposed to football violence, but experience has shown that the best policing measures are those that target individual perpetrators. These measures will only serve to inconvenience the vast majority of ordinary, match-going fans.
This is an issue the FSF will return to should the clubs meet in the play-offs.
Sussex Police say they have learned lessons and taken action against senior officers following complaints from Crystal Palace fans who travelled to Brighton in November 2017.
The EFL have agreed a “flexible framework” with Sky Sports, to allow all EFL games not already being televised to be streamed online via its iFollow platform.
A mixture of patchwork local restrictions and lack of a uniform approach to dealing with COVID-19 threatens the future of non-league clubs this season, as additional measures brought in to quell the pandemic in different regions are leaving an uneven playing field.
Since 2016 Reading FC have backed Twenty’s Plenty by offering away fans visiting the Madejski Stadium £20 tickets – and are challenging other clubs to follow suit.