Your basket

Join The FSA

Safety officers criticise Government’s safe standing stance

This is a story from the FSF archive – the FSF and Supporters Direct merged to become the FSA in 2019 – so this page may contain hyperlinks that do not work and/or have missing files. Our archived pages are not maintained and will not be updated.

If you are seeking a document regarding training or the development of your supporters’ organisation, please visit the live training and resource section of our website. if you need further assistance email: [email protected]

The body representing football safety officers has criticised the Government’s decision to reject West Bromwich Albion’s application for a safe standing pilot.

Sports Minister Tracey Crouch rejected West Brom’s proposals on Monday  and angered supporters later in the week, dismissing the case for safe standing and arguing it was only sought by a “vocal minority”.

Now the Football Safety Officers Association (FSOA) have publicly criticised the Government’s stance on the issue, claiming a pilot at West Brom would be a “perfect opportunity to gather much-needed data” on rail seating.

“Something must be done to tackle this issue,” the FSOA said this morning. “And the introduction of an alternative such as ‘rail seating’ or other systems currently being developed to enhance safety should not be ignored.

“West Bromwich Albion’s bid to trial a safe-standing section in the Smethwick End was submitted after lengthy research across Europe and also at Celtic, where similar systems are already working successfully.

“The pilot would have provided the perfect opportunity to gather much-needed data and feedback with the view of possibly introducing similar systems at grounds across England and Wales in future.”

The Sports Minister told the Press Association that she wanted to see rules around persistent standing more strictly enforced.

Her comments lead to a backlash from supporters on social media and a safe standing petition became the fastest growing on the Government’s official petition page – at the time of writing it had secured 39,000 signatures.

“However, we move forward in future, the safety of spectators must always remain paramount,” the FSOA said. “But it seems that as we strive to improve standards of safety already achieved at our grounds, the Government is then choosing to ignore what may prove to be a safer alternative to standing in seated areas.

“It is disappointing that the rejection of West Bromwich Albion’s bid means the club will not be able to explore this option of safe-standing to enable positive change and enhance match day safety at all grounds going forward.”

Thanks to PA Images for the image used in this article.

Related Articles

Standing areas have “positive impact” on safety – SGSA report

Safe standing at football grounds has had “a positive impact on spectator safety” and improved the matchday experience for thousands already, says an interim report from the SGSA.

32-year safe standing campaign finally wins!

The Football Supporters’ Association (FSA) was contacted last night by the Sports Ground Safety Association (SGSA), who told us that the option for football clubs to offer licensed standing at all levels of the game in England and Wales has at last been passed into official Government policy.

Safe standing areas come to Brentford, QPR, Wolves… and Wembley

Brentford, QPR and Wolves are the latest clubs to confirm they will have safe standing areas – and more clubs are expected to follow next season as the Government has confirmed that Premier League and Championship clubs can introduce standing during 2022/23.

UEFA approves safe standing use at European games

This week UEFA confirmed that it has approved the use of safe standing in European competitions for the upcoming 2022-23 season.

Funding partners

  • The Football Association
  • Premier Leage Fans Fund


  • Gamble Aware
  • Co-operatives UK
  • FSE
  • Kick It Out
  • Level Playing Field
  • Living Wage Foundation
  • Pledgeball