Basket
×

Your basket

Join The FSA

FA rejects Hull Tigers name change

This is a story from the FSF archive – the FSF and SD merged to become the FSA in 2019.

Sky News are reporting that the Football Association’s Membership Committee has rejected Hull City owner Assem Allam’s bid to rebrand the club Hull Tigers. The news will receive a rapturous reception among fans and the FA deserves great credit for coming to the correct conclusion.

Allam first mooted the name change in August 2013 and a coalition of Hull City fans subsequently united under the City Till We Die banner to protect their club’s identity.

Despite provocation from Allam – “they can die as soon as they want” – the group remained focused on the job in hand and delivered a superb submission to the FA during the consultation process. The group also organised a petition which gained 15,000 signatories.

The Football Supporters’ Federation and Supporters Direct submitted evidence to the FA opposing the name-change. You can read the FSF’s submission from Chief Executive Kevin Miles here.

The identity of a club is a matter of huge importance to fans and there should be clear approval from fans before any change to a club’s name is made.

Allam could easily have conducted a poll of season ticket holders and members to see what supporters wanted. He chose not to for the simple reason that the majority opposed the change. An FSF poll of members who support Hull City backed this up.

Hull City fans were asked, “Do you support the proposal to change the playing name from Hull City to Hull Tigers?” and an overwhelming 89.8% (1450) said no to the question. Only 10.2% (164) answered yes.

Right decision

Kevin Miles, Chief Executive of the FSF, said: “This is undoubtedly the right decision and credit should go both to the FA and to Hull City fans, who led a tremendous campaign.

“The fans’ groups and fanzines who came together under the City Till We Die banner have protected their club’s heritage and 110-year-old name with great dignity.

“Hull City have a track record of defending the rights of their own fans and have shown they can listen to fans by backing safe standing. Let’s hope both the club and fans put this behind them to work together again on positive campaigns.

“The FA’s decision should also serve as a warning to other owners – such fundamental changes to a club’s identity should not be made without the support of the fans.”

The Membership Committee’s recommendation will now go to the FA Council for ratification.

Thanks to Action Images for the image used in this article.

Related Articles

Government rejects West Brom’s safe standing application

West Bromwich Albion have had an application to pilot rail-seating technology at the Hawthorns rejected by the Government.

Fanspiration: Hull City Supporters Trust work in memory of Hull trawlers loss

Hull City Supporters have in recent years been constantly protesting against club owners unconventional policies, policies such as the change in club name and abolishing all concession prices. Despite that, recently club and trust have worked together unanimously on one particular project close to local hearts.

North Ferriby United AFC – What’s in a name?

What’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet; So Romeo would, were he not Romeo called, retain that dear perfection which he owes without that title.

Fans & data protection: Is your group ready for change in the law?

Later this year there will be changes to the laws governing data and how organisations protect the data they hold on their members – and this could have implications for supporter organisations up and down the country.

Funding partners

  • The Football Association
  • Premier Leage Fans Fund

Partners

  • Gamble Aware
  • Co-operatives UK
  • FSE
  • Kick It Out
  • Level Playing Field
  • Living Wage Foundation
  • SD Europe